T
393
distinctly and somewhat beverely recalling his attention to his position as Head
• of the Department,
and his
duty as such
to superintend all operations of Mr blink.
of
It is not es
easy to suppose haw in the face of such a document, unless in his reckles way he had forgotten it. M? Wilson could have ventured to pen such paragraphs as I have quoted. My Memorandum left him without the
slightest
excuse
misstatements.
39.
for such
disingenuous
I cannot, however, undertake to illustrate the inaccuracies of all M* Wilson's statements, and
beg
to observe
that in his various accounts of "papages
of
arms between himself and Mo" blank
Vide Ciclosure Nos
the latter Gentleman has not been asked to furnish his exposition of facts in reply.
because, not merely would an
uld an endless
controversy be thereby opened, but because there is so much of proved maccuracy
www
паси
and I
Sony to say of apparent untruthfulnes in Mr Wilson's statements, as renders such further investigation uncalled for.
40. It is, however, right to sift at
least
vizi
one more
apertion of Mr Milson that wherein he complains of
a
Wise fundsure surcharge having been directed to be
4. Para 13.
placed against his salary, which fact
he
regards
as a
{
"most unmerited
whilst it remains on
on
disgrace
record! I fear
that inquiry will show how entirely
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.